PROCESS on the one hand
PRODUCT on the other.
Cartesian, say: the difference between
verb-ing and noun-ing on the one hand
and a verb and a noun on the other.
Two different “substances?” No.
A cerebral distinction: all in the minding;
but the difference is substantial, so to speak.
Between velocity and position, say: moving
and standing still.
I verb and then I nominate.
A Unitarian-ist, I hate "dualities" and the
either/ors they foster: agonizing between
rocks & hard places: let me eat cake and
have it too, damnit: why can’t we all just
get along!
Wrestling, wrangling, wiggling, worming,
writhing, monkey wrenching: a wretch like
me all my not so-called professional life
caught between processing devilish
pedagogical details & saluting measurable
productive deep blue sieves.
I talk process in the terms of finished product
& collapse a sphere into Flatland.
how to write “The Raven," I might, say,
take this down: :
Do it just like a thesis-driven,
referenced "research"
anthropological
socio-logical
bullet
It’s all ONE unified matter of knowing
what you’re doing, where you’re going,
grade-gun controlled logical steps: an
exercise in clarity and lucid scheming so
as to occlude the muse, eclipse your
idios daemon & strangle the baby in its crib
—so to speak.
Flatlander by inclination, propensity, conspiracy,
convenience, convention, culture, consumer by
nature and nurture. I love me some Finished Product.
An untransformed Commodification-ist.
Process is a mess, trial & erroring oops, oh shit,
damnit, yes,Yes YES like that. It don't conform
to my Finished Product Clarity but moves in a clods
of unknowing--what? what the? what the hell?
Anyone who don't know what I'm talking about has
either never fallen into obsessive, compulsive love:
creating & making sense, moves & movies, jokes,
poems, novels, models, home runs & omelets, or
is loyal to the give & take of industrialized education's
assessable Finished Product Values, anti- emergency,
predetermined goals, aims, full body-scanning
iron purpose.:
.
process / PRODUCT
Both of these are not like the other.
I'm not saying P&P (Gary Hawkins calls them the
2 Economies; I say Playboy & Puritan) aren't
complementary values and relative. Because
they are. But HOW? That's the Liberal Art.
Need we argue? I wish we could.
Sustainably. . .
xxxooo, Sam



No comments:
Post a Comment