To Critique the Species in front of the children
without demoralization or pot & kettle-istic
liability: sanctify the
Marriage & Odd Coupling of
Glenn Beck & John Stewart,
Rachel Maddow & Ann Coulter
pees in the same pod, pods peeing into the same
whole—reaching across the aisle, so to speak:
bridging across a troubled Barbara Waters to see
how alike we all are .our hopes & fears of all the
years.
Oppositional, sure. But complementary.
We complete each other. Buffoonery all
around & from Jane Goodall’s point of
view there’s no such thing as a bad monkey.
Environmentalisms
Look:
as far as Us-as-Faculty is concerned, (no matter
our inner diversities), we’re pretty darned straight..
Us Roderick Usher straight-arrow-
academics: full of purpose, ways &
means & mission possible:aims & ends,
direction, measurable objectives and
assessable goals, attention efficient,
rubric evaluate-able, power-point
presentable presenters.
Wouldn’t you agree?
Rigor characterizes us Rodericks in the
House of Ushers so to speak not not not
this covered up and denied Madeline, sent
to the cellar catatonic—unused and therefore:
abused (a domestic violence)
Non-Straight. Antithesis of STRAIGHT, diabolically
opposed to linearity, violation and offense to ducks in
a row—all-at-once simultaneity incommensurate to
once upon a time and one at a time for the time being..
When Faulkner and Joyce introduced their streams of
unconscious-to-conscious ratios to the whirl of fiction,
it struck critics and commentators as strange, uncanny—
non- sequential, hap hazard. And MTV, remember: all
those images at seeming odds and lack or correlation
with the lyric intensity? Illogical. Irrational.
And yet IT’s closer to how-I-think than these surface
sentences sentencing consequence and my because &
affect. I’m just saying, see what I’m saying?
IT,.I said. .
Without contraries is no progress.
I see we are approaching paradox:
we must be making progress.
The Marriage of Blake & Bohrs, o my
No comments:
Post a Comment