Keeping IT Real.
This assumes Get Real has already
occurred
so that Keeping It Real becomes
a matter of
sustainability; not at all
the same deal, these 2:
Get and Keep
Get REAL. Sure, but there are three, if
you
don’t mind my saying so and insisting
(for the sake of
argument):
3 Realities
if you’ll let me
differentiate: a triad, of course;
but you can improve my terms and images;
for you, there may be many
realities; for me:
3 is all I can juggle…
Reality I : HAP.
What’s Actually Happening,
happily of course:
HAP HAPPENS
and is what IT is
& it’s beyond me and
all of us I bet
—but let me know if you can take it
all in. We’ll talk.
Reality II: generated
& sustained by
Ways we Talk about HAP
This REAL is the
World-We-Live-in, what Jung
calls Creatura; I
like to call it Alma Matrix: the
ways-we- talk—our common
sense: disciplines,
traditions, conventions
& conveniences, caves &
closets, habits &
habitats domesticizing & taming,
familiarizing HAP, so to speak, to suit our
terms
of desire and species-Procrustean-Beds. Fictions
to Live By: generating our shared facts
and factions.
Reality III: emerging
again & again:
originating
out of
Ways we talk about
Ways we talk about
HAP
Look: it gets loopy here.
Somewhat vertiginous.
Here is a philosophical
“repentance,” (turning back
to the source of our terms
& images, origins of
our representations); here is recursive
self-reference
where the topic seemingly
talked about is NOT the
TOPIC but merely means (media) for
talking about
the ways-we’re-talking; the WAYS (not the WHAT’s),
fore-grounded for
consideration so as to dig up
reality II assumptions built-in
& hidden by a common
sense that shapes our
disciplines, preserves our traditions.
Reality III mode: snuffle-up &
un-cover the operating
& controlling meta force of
Reality II which seals-in &
influences any practice so as to to feel like it’s doing
justice
to Reality I for crying out loud so as to Get R Done,
practically speaking—or pragmatically: as you like
it.
In
order to not be collapsed, conflated or
confused with
Reality II or Reality I realities, I
characterize this
Reality (III) as:
Trickster Reality, Translator Reality,
Mediator Reality,
In-Betweener Reality, Hermetic
Reality, maybe Isomorphia; I sometimes call it Yin-
Yanger Reality because it
is NOT yin nor yang but not
neither either and really
might be said to
regulate if not
govern the relationship
between the other 2 plus
I don’t
mind indulging my idiocy and calling IT whatever.
The more names the better,
I’m sure. Whatever helps
prevent collapse,
conflation, and confusion with the
other 2—so as to relate.
Douglas Hofstadter (Goedel,
Escher, Bach) indicates
this realm as UN and I guess Buddhists call it MU
to indicate not—no you did NOT, Can’t
touch this, etc..
Not
reality I (Hap) &
Not Reality II (ways of
talking about hap)
either.
I call it Reality III
(ways of talking about
ways of talking about
Hap: a mode.)
Metalogue (dialogue
about dialogue) and
Dialectic [literally:
talk which talks
across (dia)
itself]:
are 2 other ways this
reality is manifest,
a reality of
conversation going on.
a conversation
about conversation
meta-converse,
say, talk that
talks about
itself talking
(representation of
dialectic going on &on)
I was saying at the outset: Keeping IT
Real assumes
one has ( by some means or
other) already Got Real.
Keeping IT Real is a horse of another
color,
Father
& Mother & Uncle John
Went to
market, one by one.
Father
fell off! Mother fell off!
But Uncle John went on, and on,
And on, and on, and on.
A matter of sustainability, ongoing
practice: a cerebral
and affective Gold’s Gym, say,
working-out incessantly:
galloping a wallop,
voluptuous & voluntary, whimsical &
primordial, legendary
& myth-o-logical—not to be collapsed,
conflated and confused
with Logic & The Analogicals.
No comments:
Post a Comment