Thursday, May 27, 2010

Give a Man a Fish for crying out Loud


This may correlate with the
other observations about "pedagogy"
in that the emphasis is perhaps too
often on
what is being taught rather
than
how.

Does it really matter if a student is
exposed to a particular subject if
her critical thinking skills are not
exercised, and if she is not
encouraged to think in new ways?
                    Ron Bashford

Dear Ron

See: this is what will bring a SNICKER
and should: signaling the interstices,
crossroads & always frontier territory
between bottom-line content maestros
(subject matter savvy-ists) on the one
hand and on the other: pedagoguery

And will cock a brow, roll an eye, 
provoke  snick if not  snort among the
professional professionals--as opposed
to the amateurs.

I say should (send in the snickers, there ought
to be snickers) because the tension  generated
between process and product occupying the
same conversational topos  is legitimate, and
visceral--unless one dominates the other in which
case the snicker signifies an agony & discrepancy
and should be turned up: Put into play.

Give a man a _____
or
Teach him how to _____


The pattern. The fundamental educational
either/or.   Don't matter what subject-object,
content or token topic you put in that algorithm
so as to fill in the blanks,  it's the distinction and
the relationship that counts, true? 

Not the blank-fillers, yes? Dime a dozen. Galore..

Need we argue?  I wish we could, but you are off
to Amherst and round here professionalism-a-um
is the dominant pair of dimes and won't  suffer
foolishness lightly. .

xxxooo, Sam

No comments:

Post a Comment