Reason
& Clarity: Feelings & E-motions;
Tuition,
Intuition
& Counter Intuition.
Dear Co-Leagues,
IT's
a word-game, isn't it? What we do, and get good
at or not so good. Can that be said in description
of
liberal art: to put our words in play? Play & Be
Played?
Compose and Be
Composed? School & Be
Schooled?
The shibboleths of higher learning.
R & R:
Representational Re-creation
Some key definitions (inadequate, of
course &
reductive) just
to start-up, initiate, inaugurate,
generate, beget always:
to begin again and again.
"Reason" : ratios ratio-izing & rationalizations,
reifying
the relays
& relationships we
draw &
make
& agree to use&abuse for our
trade &
exchange:
twintowers
of commerce & consumption.
Commensuration.
"Reasoning” measures relations between
"this"
& “that" as
well as relationships between
relationships & so it goes and
goes keeping track
of the levels, best one can:seraphim,
cherubim,
&
thrones, say just to
start out;dominions,
virtues,
and powers: a
level up, and
then principalities,
archangels and angels
& beyond that it’s hard
to
keep track of the infinitely progressive
relations
of
relations of relations seeing as it’s all relative
that’s for sure
& reasonable once upon a time if
I can avoid mixing the
levels & meta force unknowingly.
This
kind of commensurate rationalizes & reduces
to
any "whole"
so as to be instrumental to the parts
and parties using
& abusing it in accord with their
purpose the the
terms of their desires.
Words are like digital signals
standing-for much
more than
they can index or
indicate (finger).
Think of a horizon:college
and mountains as I
come in off rt 70.
That WHOLEis
like "ana-logic":
analogical--but I sort it out and sift it tauto
"logically"
--reducing it into a relationship of the partsthat
suit my sense of the whole. I
am
"ration-alizing" the
whole, god-like for
my convenience,
conventionally.
I'm saying FEELINGS are like that
horizon. E-motions
(always
for the sake of
argument) are my
stereotyped,
convenient
& conventional "digitized" reductions of that
whole.
I rationalize Red Barn, Fields, Cows, an Outline
of
Mountains: stock response.
So much less than the
whole,
so much more is occluded by my ratios, rationales
& rationalization,
and by my
emotions: my
"rationalized"
feelings.
Reduced for
use & abuse for
crying out loud.
As with any stereotyping: there's a
convenience
(convention)
that can be used to "stand-for" the
whole. This
is rational.
To break-up the stereotypes
&
conventions & conveniencesis
ir-rational or
re-rational
(re-creative)
descriptively; not as negative judgment
or condemnation
but it sure FEELS
damaging and
dia-bolical to throw
across, parts
apart because it
breaks up a convenient
construct & breaking
up is
hard
to do.
It's difficult to use words like
“irrational” and
“reductive”
and “inadequate” as “good”
words
--describing the nature of relating
& relationship
& "dia-bolical"
as
merely whatever
throws them
across, diametrically blows
them away, undermines
and
deconstructs. WE
privilege the words “rational” &
“adequate.” Their
anti-theticals feel
like stigmas and
stone-ingsand
hurt my emotional bones.
See the problem? Clarity is a reduction
& inadequate
& an ongoing
violation to the "whole" --a crime of
discrimination even
as it might be a momentary
advantage
"partially"
to theparts
& parties wanting
to clarify in their own terms, of course.In my
own terms
of desire, of course.
We don't have good words or maybe
ways-of-talking
for talking about
how-it-is that the
more accurate our
descriptions are for me &
my purposiveness— the more
they
"occlude" and eclipse the
WHOLE & holy.
My bias-belief systems and
prejudice-convictions naturally
get in my
way. Do you see what I'm saying. Or am I making
myself too
clear?
Lucid Dreams
PS: Counter Intuitive:
Just about everything I said (above)
might FEEL counter-
intuitive:
go against the grain of feeling
I identify,
name,
indicate,
index, finger as intuitive. It’s
impossible
to get
in
touch with my
feelings. It's
impossible to say just what
I mean.
Any thing that GOES AGAINST convention (my convention
or
social convention,
which is to say: my
stereotypes or
social
stereotypes,
which is to say, "my
emotions"
or the “social
emotions")
is going to FEEL
counter-intuitive. Hello! if not
like
hell.
Intuitive is a habit hobbit: the cerebral
& affective
environmentality
I live "inside" my house of "intuitions"
inhabiting
my habits habitually. You got a
problem with that?
Counter-Intuitive feels like Big Bad Woof
knocking on the
doors
of my stereotypical houses— as-if
to blow them away:
me
& my ecological whirlwinds..
How do I KNOW if BBWoof is sheep in
wolf's clothing—
or not?
Damn:
it feels counter-intuitive.
No wonder I'm conflicted.
xxxooo, Sam
No comments:
Post a Comment