Dear Dean (& Colleagues),
A former chemistry student wrote me the other day
thanking me for teaching him how to not use logic
where it wasn't needed.
This is long and illlogical (no syllogisms) : something
I wrote some years ago--a conversation between the
2 of us. Consider, or Ignore. Always for the sake of
argument,. or what good's a liberal art?.
To Justify the Ways of Pain to
Myn
Waffle House
Con-Verse-Action with El Supremo also
known as Mad Science
Kahl, where we saluted
Michael
Torres finishing up his
breakfast & off
to participate in
Service Day while we took a second
cup of
coffee and
wondered over the nature of SERVICE & the
human
predicament and whether one’s
fundamental
operating
assumption concerning
human nature…
(basically
“good,” basically
“evil” or
waffling in between: we
assign
parameters for the sake of
argument)
…determines
one’s policies
& party participation, how
one
treats one’s
spouse, raises children & a little Cain
or not,
propagates a
dilly-dally philandering or stalwart
pioneering philanthropic industrialism
and instigates—
or not—the
recognition of my
biases, prejudices, greed
& misery; or covers them politely
from crying-out in
public
for the sake
of the
body-politic.
It depends on
how I want
to define my determinations,
whether I
care to meet on
the same pager or not & try to
include all
the noise with
the news, or be exclusive & keep
the channels clean: but I claim
generously &
with un-
postponed joy
we’re all
evil-doers; I certainly am Non-
Serviam-Sam
& bet I’m
not the only one: it’s
my human
nature to
vote for evil
coming up from down under to
screw around
with the
goodies & unnatural hierarchy &
try to make
it go my way,
of course, & not just the way of
the arab
& them
terrorist bastards!
I’m pure: a
puritan, see; won’t
you bring it
on: I see homo
faber ludic
sapience as
basically “evil” (upos: up-from-down
under); makes good non-condemnatory
sense to me just
describing
the race &
it’s the denial that damages, hits the
fan, raises my fog of psychic
hazardous dust,
emergent
subsequent
sneezes, runny gnosis
& epistemological break-
down &
buck dance like
some SUV on black ice unawares..
What?
I’m making
non-sense
again?
I deny it!
This is good
stuff,
good stuff.
(THERE:
right there in
denial & refusal to listen is how my
Oh Zone
contribution
contaminates environmental studies
& the
toxic
readings shift a notch from yellow to orange to
red alert
oooo my
gawd.)
Anyone don’t
have to
celebrate a diversity that is New
Englandly puritan, where we always do
what persecution
we
must to make
the world a better place
to see the
precarious situation at
hand.
Any PRE-18th
c.
modernist so-called age
of
Rationalization
frame-of-minding,
minding
that is medieval or classical Socratic,
or choose
your Eastern
attitude-of-preference might could bring
you to a
similar point of
viewing if you adjust for small or large
variations on
the theme:
down on your knees! bump
your knobby
head on the
ground with
the faithful: acknowledge
that the more
we fix-it
the more
it tears loose & don’t make no common sense
or respond to
my so-called
be-reasonable because & affect &
terms of
desire.
humania! ah, humania! can’t live
with it can’t live with
out:
it’s so
beautiful &
passionate & pathetic & patho-logically in-
denial
weaving that old
black magic that I weave so well
wherever I go there I am: got to love
it or I’m
integrally
& royally
screwed.
Kahl finished
his sausage
biscuit and tomato and me my 2
waffles and we dint have time to put
this matter to
rest.
He went on to
wrangle molecules
for the rest of Service Day
and me I’m
wrestling with
god of course or maybe
some
arbitrary
angel artificial
but it’s a mess I plan to fix by
Monday
Morning, tidy up
for school work programs:
my studies in
human
nature, language, and fiction:
that triad. .
xxxooo, Sam
No comments:
Post a Comment