The Violence Bears IT
              Away 
“We do not think real
            time, but we live it,because life
            transcends intellect… 
Any thing  that is
              irreducible and irreversible in the  successive moments
               
f a history eludes
              science.
The
            intellectualization of science can work  only on what is thus  withdrawn 
from the   action of real time.
This is only what
              we should expect, given that  science and intellect
              focus
on what can fall  under general
              laws. It is the task of intuition to provide 
insight
              into becoming. To get a  notion of IT one
              must break with Science, 
doing violence to
              the mind by going counter  to the natural
              bent of intellect.
This ‘violence,’
              Bergson sees, as ‘the function  of philosophy.’” (from
Genevieve
Lloyd’s Being in Time,
            on Henry Bergson’s Creative Evolution)
Otherwise, without
            un-bending the intellect’s natural bent, say, IT
            is like
looking for keys-lost-in-the-dark-alley
            under the street lamp where the 
light is
            good. IT = measure-mental assessmental  ratio-cinative
            studies,
aims goals, and predictable
            outcomes . 
What is IT, that
            Science and Intellect are  inadequate to
            measure? 
Anything alive, being becoming. 
The Most
            Liberalist College
            in America
Devils IN
          the Details
Consider
          the difference
          between General Truth
and
          Specific Truth— truth
          of a forest, say, and 
truth of a
          specific tree,
          truth of a class, say,
and truth
          of a member,
          truth of a community 
and truth
          of a citizen, truth
          of humanity and truth
of a
          person, truth of a
          team or band and truth of 
a
          player…the individual on
          the one hand, the 
collective
          on the other.
The two
          truths represent
          different  levels of
Logical
          Type (Whitehead, Russell),
          as wholes
are to
          parts; and they are
          incommensurate: the
terms and
          values and
          standards of the part do
not apply
          (except in error
          and projection and
by habit of
          convention) to
           the standards of the
whole, and
          vice  versa.
But I
          collapse and confuse
          the 2 sets  of values 
and the
          General  Truth
          dominates  the Specific
          – 
where
          differences and  diversity
          fragment &
eclipse
          general truth so
          that it is also the case
that the
          Specific truths  obscure
          Generality. 
General
          Truth dominates
          the values of Specific
truth.  Specific truth obscures
          the values of
General
          Truth.      
It is the
          gap between
          General and Specific that 
makes
          history  unpredictable:
          between social and
individual,
          between common sense
          and  idiocy.
But I am
          convinced that
          GENERAL TRUTH is more
          
true than my  specific
          individual experience
          and so I 
rely on
          statistics  and  probabilities
          to urge me to
          check
my colons  and breasts
          and lungs for
          cancer, go to college 
rather than
          avoid the
          bother…General Truth seduces 
me
          even as my Specific
          Truth resists and rebels
          and
succumbs to
          popular opinion.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment