If a Fool Persist in his Folly,
he becomes Wise.
The Road of Excess leads to
the Palace of Wisdom
Wm Blake
2 bumper sticker on the backs of my I-lids.
I'm counting on them.
@@@@@@
What is a generally educated person? Peer Review 7:4-7.
"List five ideas or skills you want all our students to learn.
1. The pleasures and sport and art of "argo" argument: building up a
shared "shine" is what the word "argument" originally described.
Edification (as differentiated from "education")--a collaborative deal.
2. Dialectic I. "talking across (dia) the talk"--which is to say: the
ability to not only be talking (arguing) about some token topic, but
also to be talking about HOW the talk is being "talked."
3. Dialectic II. the familiar thesis <--> antithesis relationship:
worthy opposition where the "enemy" is loved so as to keep
IT
converse-action
values and synthesis
opposition of the terms
4. In other words: they might could learn and practice
"the Liberal
confused with the ideas
those majors and minors they study
accreditation.
5. For my 5th "five," I give Dean Kahl my proxy.
What is a Generally Educated Person?
List and compile:
5 persons,
5 places
5 musical or artistic pieces
5 books
that I would want ALL our students to know,
visit, see or hear, read
become a Generally Educated person?
I can't think this way.
A lot of folks on Face Book seem able to play
this kind of numbers
It doesn’t matter.
There are no kinds of deals like this that ALL
students should experience,
the benefit of such polling is that it says some
thing
curricula--except that it
Education and General Education can be
determined in terms of "things" --"nouns"--
events--leveled to the common sense.
As opposed to processes.
Anyone might could argue with me on this.
As Neils Bohr says
profound truth is another profound truth;
not only
generating paradox: we must be making progress.
" Something like that is what he said. Close to it.,
I guess if
(dead or alive), we could nail it down: exactly
what he said.
THAT right THERE --the arguing out (and sustained)
of the value
for Gen Ed purposes is what IT's all about.
T, I said.
Do I have to be spelling IT out?
Putting
Play & Be Played. School &
The what don't matter so much. Tokens. Got to have
them to play
5 Best terms. We do that with
selecting DVD's maybe. But it's a distraction
determining GEN ED-ing, I'd say.
This is all "for the sake of argument" which is the
heart of academics,
and GOOD at it. That would be my
Gen Ed:
Ways of Talking
Ways of Thinking
Ways of Knowing
Not to be confused with persons, places, things.
The significant problems we face cannot
same level of thinking that created them."
Could be a shibboleth, thorn in the flesh, pea under the mattress:
that we attempt to track “the same level" (would level be the same
as “kind”) of thinking that is habitual and familiar so as to put it
in play with antitheses and antagony.
Shoot me and make the world a better place.
xxxooo, Sam
No comments:
Post a Comment