Fools Might Could Rush In

Dear Colleagues,

In an academic community I guess the niche left

open for the play of foolishness is actually abysmal:  
seemingly groundless, a yawning chasm deceptively

appearing as splinter, thorn,  pea  under a mattress

(to mix meta force): chaos*  really, that  source of

higher order math  might map if it could, or at least

acknowledge.

Or  IT’s like a seesaw, say, Archimedean lever

grounded on hypothesis with the whole academic

community seated on the side of  seriously: we’ve

got work to do leaving other side open for  some

90 lb fool to balance the equation.

                     

Insensitive to                      Overly sensitive

“initial”                                     to “initial”

conditions.                                   conditions.

An environmental & sustainable issue: regulating

serious-to-foolish ratios in (let’s say, for the sake

of argument) a “closed”  system  at any given point

in  time: its noetic weather & affective climate &

the emerging phenomenal values generating from

the converse-action between ludic and illudic and

how-it-is they just get along.   Or don’t.

A Liberal Art General Educational question and

quest: Not your liberal arts concern: vocational,

instrumental, utilitarian, taking care of  business

in these troubled turbulent times—never mind.  .

*Everyday examples of chaotic systems include

 cerebral weather and  affective climate.^[1] There

 is some controversy over the existence of chaotic

dynamics in template tectonics and  home economics,

and local  foodback circuitry.^[2][

xxxooo, Sam