Articulate {"to flay the beast at the joints
with minimum of blood and gristle")
Representation Representing Counts
More
than What’s Represented.
Shadows fly
north, crossing over trees in the early
afternoon sunlight; not the crows
themselves —high
over
Jensen—but shapes passing over the cars in the
lot below.
IT’s got to
be about
something, some deal or other, but
that's not
what it’s really
about: it’s really about the
process of
being able to be
about something: some
deal
or other. The
media, in this case, is
the message —not
the overt,
ostensible
apparent message, which of course
naturally dominates
discourse: the appearances, right?
as
distinct from
…what? higher reality? Or the deeper
grammar &
ecologic of conversation? How do we
manage
to
maintain the distinction between the
superficialities
and
the process that generates them?
Assuming we
want to.
Writing. Holy smokes!
Don’t let
what-I’m-saying
eclipse THAT I’M SAYING for
crying out loud:
saying “saying”
is what I’m saying, or
(amounting to the same thing) writing about writing.
Thinking on the one
hand about thinking, and
then on
the
other hand: thinking about this and that and the
other.
Do the math: you
can tell which is
“primary”—
which secondary and so forth.
“No matter how sophisticated we
may be as to the
constructed
and arbitrary character of our
practices, including
practices of
representation, our
practice of practices is one of actively
forgetting such mischief each time
we open our mouths
to ask for something or make a statement….To witness
mimesis, to marvel at its wonder
or fume at its
duplicity,
is to sentient-ly…register
its profound influence on
everyday practices
of representation.” (Taussig)
Description
is “better”
than that which is described.
Composition
itself: more
significant than what’s
composed. And the same with “seeing” and “saying”
—the
participial version indicates
a value “higher”
than what the
nouns channel: “seen”
and “said,”
mere tokens
of the process
itself. Carriers.
Conversation,
likewise, outweighs (so to speak)
both conversants and the stuff talked about
(what we call subject matter, object matter,
topics: the whiners of our
dys-content.)
No comments:
Post a Comment