Reductionism
What seems
the
succession
of thought is only the
distribution of the
whole into
causal
sequence.
Emerson:
commenting on the
difference
if not
relationship between thinking
on
the one hand
(so to speak) and on the
other hand its manifest expression as
linear
sequence and succession one
after the
other, time after time like these
words on a
screen: sequential.
But the thought is whole:
an all-at-once-ness
parsed into
beginning-middle-end,
simultaneity translated into cause
& effect, eternity
chronological-ized:
the song over but the melody lingering on;
how could it be otherwise?
I am a miser:
holding on to what I got:
this & that & that. No way can I let go
my because & affect,
reasons-why,
explanatory interpretations
&
blame-ations, escape- goating
terms of desire one after
another in time and
space.
Might as well
say—
my head stuck in
a bucket of water—
“Breathe,
Sam: just breathe:
you’ve got gills you never imagined.”
Spirit on the
one hand reduced to
letters
on the other hand: words, sentences
I can sulk over, sanctify, quibble &
correct.
Here’s how..
Here’s why.. Here’s when.
Me measuring
all things & no things,
so as to see & say
hap happening happily
one thing after another
reducing the whole
into causal sequence
for the sake of
convenience
if not always
convention. (Usually convention.)
No comments:
Post a Comment