“We’re all
crazy egos hungry for love.”
says
Sherwood Anderson.— hungry egos
crazy for love “Grunt
tu molani,” says
Henderson.
the Rain King: I want. I want.
Einstein
claimed the kind of thinking that
gets us into a muddle can’t get us out. Are
we in a muddle? Can you characterize
the kind of thinking we think that got
us here? Can you
imaging any other kind
of thinking? (Not content or subject matter:
kind —way, manner, process.) Say.
I am
privileged to argue with fundamentalists
and
atheists, agnostics, conservatives and
liberals
and libertarians, Lutherans and
orthodox Presbyterians.
They all think the
same way.
Different content, sure, topics and
subject
matter: we celebrate diversity.
But the
mind-set (bias & belief preservation,
homeland security bells and whistles, offense
and defense, right/wrong, correct/incorrect,
good&evil righteous king of the hill wrestling
and
wrangling our truth to make known) is
same old
same old--peas in a pod.
How could
it be otherwise?
Varieties
of Crazy Egos hungry for love.”a
No comments:
Post a Comment